Derrick Posted September 1, 2015 Report Share Posted September 1, 2015 H. montanum Blume (Carl Ludwig von Blume) in Bijdragen tot de Flora van Nederlandsch Indie, sec3, pt16, p956, (1825/26). (Bijdr.)http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/9225#page/324/mode/1up. Described as having short-petioled oblong leaves, yet Jack described H. formicarum as having short-petioled elliptic-ovate leaves, a tenuous distinction. Therefore, J. D. Hooker in Flora of British India vol.3, p194, (1881) sank H. montanum into H. formicarum. http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/13816#page/198/mode/1up Type http://plants.jstor.org/stable/10.5555/al.ap.specimen.u0044210 (Java) Other uses of H. montanum. H. montanum (Blume) D C. (Augustin Pyramo de Candolle) in Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, IV (4) p451, (1830) (d. c. Prod.) http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/7153#page/456/mode/1up. H. montanum (Blume) Miq. (Friedrich Anton Wilhelm Miquel) in Flora van Nederlandsch Indië vol 2, p309, (1856). (Fl. Ned. Ind.) http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/5869506#page/317/mode/1up. P240 mentions Hydnophytum http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/1864#page/248/mode/1up. H. montanum (Blume) Miq. in Annales Musei Botanici Lugduno-Batavi vol.4, Select Rubiaceae of The East Indian Archipelago, pp256/7, (1869) (Ann. Bus. Bot. Lugd.- bat) as Hydrophytum montanum (sic) a typographical error on pp256/7. Yet on p309 correctly as Hydnophytum montanum. http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/5869506#page/317/mode/1up. Original Latin http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/2547#page/282/mode/1up. H. montanum Scheff (Rudolph Herman Christiaan Carel Scheffer) was an illegitimate name according to Tropicos, http://www.tropicos.org/Name/100204726. It was used in Annales du Jardin Botanique Buitenzorg, vol 1, plantes de la Nouvelle-Guinée, p31 (1876). (Ann. Jard. Bot. Buitenzorg) http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/88793#page/40/mode/1up But as I advised, Scheff correctly cites (Blume) Miq. loco citato (citing) p256, referring to (Ann. Mus. Bot. Lugd.- bat) Furthermore, Odoardo Beccari in Malesia raccolta 2, p151. (1884/5) under H. moseleyanum var teysmannii cites Scheff as his source, hence the error. Now corrected in the Tropicos database. Malesia 2. http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/44197923#page/265/mode/1up. (Scheff.) Becc. Malesia Raccolta, 2 (3) p156, (1884/5) as Scheff http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/44197691#page/202/mode/1up also pp90- 92. Distribution http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/44197729#page/240/mode/1up As formicarum montanum http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/44197923#page/270/mode/1up. Note for illustration http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/44197827#page/338/mode/1up. H. montanum var. latifolia Miq. (Friedrich Anton Wilhelm Miquel) see Hydnophytum formicarum f. latifolium (Miq.) Becc. and in turn H. formicarum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeff Posted September 1, 2015 Report Share Posted September 1, 2015 Beccari indicate a lot of montanum named formicarum H.formicarum montanum typicum H.formicarum montanum buxifolium H. " " longifolium H. " " cochinchinense H. " " lucidum H. " " minor H. " " borneense with sometimes different leaves form flower form and anther ,stigma position . have you an idea to unravel it all ? jeff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.